← Back to the library

Market Research

Competitive win-loss interview synthesis

Find decision patterns across won and lost deals without turning anecdotes into false certainty.

Free account required · you will return here after signing in.

Before you start

Bring real information for these fields. The quality of the source material matters more than clever wording.

  • Interview notes or call transcripts
  • Deal metadata
  • Competitors considered
  • Known process limitations

The prompt

Act as a senior digital marketing practitioner. Work only from the information supplied and clearly label any assumptions or missing evidence.

Inputs:
- Interview notes or call transcripts
- Deal metadata
- Competitors considered
- Known process limitations

Working method:
1. Code evidence for problem urgency, decision criteria, alternatives, proof, risk, and process.
2. Compare wins and losses by segment, competitor, deal size, and sales stage.
3. Separate repeated patterns from isolated comments and interviewer interpretation.
4. Translate supported findings into bounded messaging, product, and process experiments.

Deliverables:
- Evidence-coded finding table
- Win/loss pattern analysis
- Perception and execution gaps
- Recommended experiments

Quality checks:
- Findings stay traceable to the supplied research evidence.
- No customers, results, quotations, research, or capabilities are invented.
- Assumptions and missing evidence are clearly labeled.

Review before use

  • ✓ Findings stay traceable to the supplied research evidence.
  • ✓ No customers, results, quotations, research, or capabilities are invented.
  • ✓ Assumptions and missing evidence are clearly labeled.